Know who you are paying, before you commit to them.
A supplier record that is only a name and a bank account is a liability. This one carries lifecycle status, risk, certifications, performance and the documents that prove them — and the status is enforced, not advisory.
The register
Status that stops things, not status that decorates.
Most systems hold a supplier status nobody checks. Here the status is a control: a suspended or debarred supplier cannot be invited, cannot quote and cannot be awarded, and the attempt is recorded.
LifecycleProspective, Approved, Preferred, On Hold, Suspended, Debarred — and the last three block
RiskRisk rating, segment and single-source flag on the record itself
DocumentsInsurance, certifications and clearances, with expiry dates that are chased before they lapse
Bank detailsThe most abused field in procurement, changed under control rather than on an email from a stranger
.../suppliers
Supplier masterThe register, with lifecycle status, risk and segment.
For the buyer
Performance measured from what happened, not from opinion.
Delivery and invoice history are already in the system, so a scorecard does not need a survey to exist.
SimpleRead the scorecard: on-time delivery, invoice accuracy, complaint history
ThenMove a vetted supplier from Prospective to Approved, and set standing status where it is earned
ThenUse performance as evidence at renewal rather than as a conversation
ComplexPut a failing supplier On Hold — every route into an award closes at once, without needing anyone to remember
.../performance
Performance & riskSupplier performance over real delivery and invoice history.
For the supplier
They maintain their own record, which is why it is current.
Supplier data goes stale because the buying side owns it. Give the supplier the screen and the reminder, and it maintains itself.
SimpleRegister, complete the profile and upload documents
ThenBe told before a certification lapses, rather than after it blocks an award
ThenKeep categories current, so they are invited to the right competitions
ComplexRaise a complaint about a process they believe went wrong — recorded, answered in writing, and visible to governance
.../portal
Supplier portalThe supplier's own record, kept current by the supplier.
For governance
Complaints answered in writing, and kept.
A supplier complaint is the early warning for a challenge. Recording and answering them is both good practice and the cheapest possible insurance.
RecordedComplaints raised from the portal land against the event they concern
AnsweredResolved with a written response, held on the record
VisibleComplaint history shows on the supplier and on the event
ProofA pattern of complaints about one buyer or one category is visible before somebody outside the organisation notices it
.../complaints
ComplaintsSupplier complaints, and the written response to each.
For a procurement director
Concentration is a risk you can only manage if you can see it.
The supplier questions a board asks are about dependency and exposure, not about individual purchase orders.
SeesSupplier concentration — how much of the spend sits with how few
SeesSingle-source dependencies, flagged on the record
SeesDiverse and local supplier share, measured rather than estimated
DoesTargets the categories where a second source would actually reduce risk
.../suppliers
Supplier masterThe register a public buyer sees, with the same controls.